Minimally invasive spine surgery techniques in the ambulatory setting: Are they safe and effective?

@#<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Background:</strong> Minimally invasive spine surgical techniques (MISST) are associated with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter duration of surgery, and less post-operative pain. In the last two decades, MISST have been performed on an outpatient basis in developed countries but it is still performed primarily on an inpatient basis in the Philippines. This study aims to determine the safety and effectiveness of performing MISST in an ambulatory surgical center in the Philippines.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Methods:</strong> A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent MISST in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) in Manila, Philippines, from January 2014 to December 2018 was done. The different types of MISST were identified and analyzed as to patient demographic characteristics, anesthetic perioperative management, outcomes and complications.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results:</strong> Out of 337 patients included in the review, 8 types of MISST were identified. The average patient age was 55.61 years. Majority (98.2%) of the patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II. All patients had a statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in pain scores. ASC length of stay varied based on the complexity of the procedure ranging from 2.1 to 12.9 hours. There was a 0.89% incidence of surgery-related complications. Majority (94.4%) of the patients were discharged to home. There was no mortality.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Even in a developing country, transitioning MISST from inpatient to the ambulatory setting can be performed with minimal complications and unplanned hospital admissions while still achieving significant pain reduction. The key elements include careful patient selection, close coordination between the anesthesia and spine surgical teams, and provision of multimodal analgesia.</p>

Abordaje mínimamente invasivo para hernias de disco extraforaminales: indicaciones, consideraciones quirúrgicas y resultados clínicos / Minimally Invasive Approach for Extraforaminal Herniated Discs: Indications, Surgical Considerations, and Clinical Outcomes

Introducción: Las hernias de disco extraforaminales representan entre el 0.3% y el 11.3% del total de las hernias de disco lumbares. Existen múltiples procedimientos quirúrgicos para el tratamiento de las mismas. Objetivo: Nuestro objetivo es presentar una serie de 5 casos de hernia de disco extraforaminal tratados mediante abordaje tubular mínimamente invasivo, describir la técnica quirúrgica utilizada y analizar la literatura pertinente. Pacientes y método: Cinco pacientes sin respuesta al tratamiento conservador con diagnóstico de hernia de disco extraforaminal, fueron sometidos a tratamiento quirúrgico mediante técnica tubular mínimamente invasiva durante el período de enero 2018-febrero 2019. Se analizaron datos demográficos e intraoperatorios. Los resultados clínicos fueron evaluados mediante la Escala Visual Analógica pre y postquirúrgico (EVA). Resultados: Cinco pacientes presentaron déficit neurológico y dolor lumbar que requirieron resolución quirúrgica. Todos los pacientes fueron dados de alta dentro de las 24 hs. postoperatorias. La escala de dolor disminuyó de forma estadísticamente significativa entre el momento pre y post quirúrgico (p=0.038). No se registraron fístulas ni infecciones. Conclusión: El abordaje tubular mínimamente invasivo fue una técnica efectiva para el tratamiento de hernias extraforaminales

ntroduction: Extraforaminal disc herniations represents 0.3-11.3% of every herniated lumbar discs. A variety of surgical procedures may be used for the treatment of this pathology. Objective: The aim of this study is to present 5 cases of extraforaminal herniated discs treated via a minimally invasive spine surgery using tubular retractors, to describe the surgical technique and to analyze the literature on this subject. Pacients and method: 5 patients who did not get better with conservative treatment were operated using minimally invasive tubular retractors between January 2018 and February 2019. Demographic variables and intraoperative data were analyzed. Clinical outcomes was evaluated using the Analog Visual Scale (VAS). Results: Five patients who presented neurological deficit and low back pain were operated. Every patients was discharged before 24 hours postoperative. VAS significantly decrease comparing pre and postoperative (p=0.038). No cerebrospinal fluid leaks or infections were recorded. Conclusion: The use of minimally invasive tubular retractors is an effective technique for treating extraforaminal herniated discs.

Research progress in minimally invasive treatment of cervical nerve root canal stenosis under total endoscope / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To review the research progress of total endoscopic minimally invasive technique in treating cervical nerve root canal stenosis (CNRCS). Methods: The related literature at home and abroad was extensively reviewed. The research history, current situation, research progress, advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive treatment of CNRCS under total endoscope were summarized. Results: In recent years, with the continuous development of minimally invasive technique of total endoscope in spine surgery, the surgical treatment methods are also constantly innovated. Compared with the traditional open surgery, minimally invasive treatment of CNRCS under total endoscope can obtain better effectiveness, keep the stability of the cervical segment to the maximum extent, reduce the impact on the activity of the cervical spine and the occurrence of related surgical complications, which is an effective minimally invasive technology. Conclusion: The minimally invasive treatment of CNRCS under total endoscope has achieved some results, which is expected to be one of the indispensable means to treat CNRCS, but it still needs to be improved.

CT multiple-level reconstruction for preoperational estimation of facet joint violation in lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw placement / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: Percutanoues pedicle screw internal fixation is widely used for treating lumbar disease. Because the surgery is guided by the C-arm, it is hard to control the position between screws and facet joint to cause the facet joint violation completely. Body mass index > 29.9 kg/m2, facet joint angle > 35°and age < 65 years old are considered as the high risk factors for percutaneous pedicle screw injury of articular processes. Due to the different positional relationship between the pedicle axis of the lumbar spine and the articular process joint, there is no related report on whether the destruction of the articular process joint by screws is different. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the significance of lumbar CT multi-planar reconstruction for preestimating facet joint violation in lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw placement. METHODS: One hundred patients with lumbar fracture and degenerative disease who underwent percutaneous pedicle screw placement were selected. All patients signed the informed consents and the study was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. The position line of the oblique axial view, oblique sagittal view and oblique coronal view was adjusted to reconstruct the section of pedicle. A circle with the 6.5 mm of position line of the oblique coronal view as its center to check the relationship between the circle and facet joint served as preoperation group. CT examination was performed after surgery for evaluating the degree of facet joint violation by screws and served as postoperation group. The amount of screws which damage the facet joint of different vertebrae between two groups and the damage rate among vertebrae in each group were compared. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Totally 478 screws were placed, 109 (22.8%) screws violated facet joints in the preoperation group, and the amount of circles which violated facet joint was 6 (6.8%), 9 (10.5%), 19 (18.3%), 30 (30.0%), and 45 (45.0%) from L1-L 5. (2) 115 (24.1%) screws violated facet joints in the postoperation group, the amount of circles which violated facet joint was 10 (11.4%), 7 (8.1%), 15 (14.4%), 26 (26.0%) and 41 (41.0%) from L1-L 5. (3) The P values of McNamara test of different vertebrae were 0.08 (L1), 0.22 (L2), 0.20 (L3), 0.05 (L4) and 0.08 (L5). There was no significant difference between two groups. (4) The results of Kappa test were 0.67 (L1), 0.80 (L2), 0.80 (L3), 0.87 (L4) and 0.92 (L5). The damage rate among vertebrae in each group had significant differences (P=0.000). (5) To conclude, the relationship between percutanoues pedicle screw and facet joint could be recognized by lumbar CT multiple level reconstruction, which provides a reliable method for preestimating the possibility of facet joint damage caused by the percutanoues pedicle screw.

Cirugía mínimamente invasiva en el tratamiento de fracturas tóracolumbares / Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures

Objetivo: Analizar y describir una serie de fracturas tóraco-lumbares traumáticas tratadas con cirugía mínimamente invasiva. Material y métodos: Analizamos una serie de 26 pacientes con fracturas traumáticas tóraco-lumbosacras entre 2010-2017. Las imágenes pre-operatorias fueron clasificadas usando la clasificación AO. Analizamos en forma pre y post operatoria: escala visual analógica, volumen de pérdida sanguínea, duración de la hospitalización, complicaciones, cirugías asociadas en otros órganos, extracción de implantes en el largo plazo, estado neurológico pre y post quirúrgico y mortalidad.Los pacientes con historias clínicas completas, TAC pre-operatoria y un seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses fueron incluidos (18 hombres y 8 mujeres). La edad promedio fue de 28.7 años (21-84 años); seguimiento promedio de 28 meses (13-86 meses). Dieciocho pacientes fueron manejados con instrumentaciones percutáneas, 8 recibieron vertebroplastias, y en 5 casos se realizó además algún gesto de artrodesis. Resultados: La EVA mejoró 7 puntos promedio respecto al pre-operatorio; el promedio de sangrado fue de 40 mL, no observamos ningún caso de empeoramiento neurológico. La duración promedio de la hospitalización fue de 3.9 días. Cuatro enfermos necesitaron alguna cirugía en otro órgano producto de sus politraumatismos.Los tornillos percutáneos fueron removidos en 9 casos luego de la consolidación. Como complicaciones tuvimos: 1 hematoma retroperitoneal autolimitado, una fractura pedicular y una cánula de cementación rota adentro de un pedículo. Conclusión: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva en trauma espinal es una alternativa válida que permite estabilización, movilización precoz y logra buenos resultados en términos de control del dolor con baja tasa de complicaciones

Objective: To analyze and describe a series of trauma-related thoraco-lumbo-sacral vertebral fractures managed with minimally invasive surgery. Methods: We retrospectively review the charts and images of 26 patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures between 2010-2017. Pre-op images were assessed and fractures were classified according to the thoraco-lumbar trauma AO Spine classification. We analyzed pre and post-surgical visual analog scale (VAS), blood loss during surgery, hospital length of stay, complications, associated surgical procedures, long term post-op implant removal, pre and post neurological status and mortality.Patients with a complete case record, pre-op CT scans and minimum 12-month follow up were included (18 males and 8 females). Mean age was 28.7 years (21-84 years); mean post-op follow up was 28 month (13-86 months). Eighteen patients were managed with percutaneous instrumentation, 8 patients also received percutaneous vertebroplasty, and 5 patients underwent also some arthrodesis procedure. Results: VAS improved 7 points as compared to the pre-op score; mean blood loss was 40 mL, we did not observed any neurological deficit worsening. Mean hospital length of stay was 3.9 days. Four patients needed surgical procedures involving other organs due to politrauma. Percutaneous screws were removed in 9 cases after fracture consolidation. Complications were: one case of self-limiting retroperitoneal hematoma, one case of pedicle screw fracture and one cement broken cannula into the pedicle. Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgery in spine trauma is a valid option allowing stabilization, early mobilization, and leading to good outcomes in terms of pain control and a lower complication rate

Resección de quistes sinoviales por técnica tubular mínimamente invasiva. ¿Abordaje ipsilateral o contralateral? / Resection of synovial cysts by minimally invasive tubular technique. Ipsilateral or contralateral approach?

Introducción: Los quistes artrosinoviales espinales son lesiones infrecuentes que se originan principalmente en la región lumbar. Aunque el tratamiento conservador es posible, la resección quirúrgica es considerada el tratamiento de elección en pacientes sintomáticos. La inestabilidad postoperatoria es una preocupación. Las técnicas mínimamente invasivas (MISS) demostraron ser una alternativa válida que podría disminuir el riesgo de inestabilidad postoperatoria. Objetivo: Describir la importancia de la orientación facetaria en la elección del lado del abordaje (ipsilateral o contralateral) y la conservación de la unión articular en una serie de pacientes operados de quistes sinoviales lumbares por técnica tubular mínimamente invasiva. Material y métodos: Se evaluaron 8 pacientes con quistes sinoviales lumbares operados con técnica tubular mínimamente invasiva. Se analizó en RMN la relación entre la orientación de las facetas articulares y la vía de abordaje seleccionada, se evaluó además la resección de los quistes sinoviales y el grado de preservación facetaria postoperatoria. Información demográfica e intraoperatoria fue detallada. El resultado clínico fue valorado usando la Escala Visual Analógica (VAS) y los criterios de Macnab modificados para medir la satisfacción postoperatoria de los pacientes. El seguimiento mínimo fue de 6 meses. Resultados: Ocho quistes sinoviales fueron operados y resecados completamente. Cinco pacientes presentaron orientación facetaria coronal y 3 sagital los cuales fueron abordados del lado ipsilateral y contralateral respectivamente. En todos los casos se logró preservar al menos 2/3 de la unión facetaria del nivel comprometido. El tiempo promedio de cirugía fue de 110 minutos. Todos los pacientes fueron dados de alta dentro de las 24 hs. Se observó una mejoría de 6 puntos en el VAS. Según la escala de Macnab; 6 pacientes refirieron resultados excelentes, 1 bueno y 1 regular. No se registraron fístulas ni infecciones. Conclusión: La orientación de las facetas articulares definió el lado del abordaje. En facetas articulares con orientación coronal recomendamos el abordaje tubular ipsilateral y en facetas articulares con orientación sagital el abordaje contralateral. Esto permite una excelente exposición del quiste sinovial y la preservación de la articulación facetaria. Ensayos prospectivos con mayor tiempo de seguimiento y cohortes más grandes serían de utilidad para avalar nuestras recomendaciones.

Background: Spinal arthro-synovial cysts are uncommon lesions that largely originate in the lumbar area. Although conservative management is an option, surgical resection is considered the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients. Post-operative instability is of concern, however. Minimally-invasive surgery techniques have proven a valid option which might reduce post-surgical instability. The aim of this paper is to describe the importance of facet orientation in side selection for the surgical approach (ipsilateral or contralateral) and facet joint sparing in a series of patients undergoing minimally-invasive tubular surgery (MITS) for lumbar synovial cysts. Methods: Eight patients with lumbar synovial cysts undergoing MITS were assessed. Pre-operatively, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to identify facet joint orientation and aid in surgical approach selection. Post-operatively, MRI was repeated to confirm resection of the synovial cysts and the level of post-surgical facet sparing. Demographic and intraoperative data were recorded, with post- versus pre-operative pain compared using a visual analog scale (VAS), and the modified Macnab criteria used to measure patients' post-operative satisfaction. Minimum post-operative follow-up was six months. Results: Eight synovial cysts were resected completely. Five patients had a coronal and three a sagittal orientation of their facet and were managed with an ipsilateral versus contralateral approach, respectively. In all cases, at least 2/3 of the involved facet joint was spared. Average surgical time was 110 minutes, and all patients were discharged within 24 hours. A mean 6-point improvement was observed in VAS pain severity. Using the Macnab scale, six patients reported excellent results, one a good result and one a fair result. No spinal leaks or infections were reported. Conclusions: Facet-joint orientation determines which side is used for the surgical approach. For facet joints with a coronal orientation, we recommend the ipsilateral tubular approach; while for joint facets with a sagittal orientation, the contralateral approach. This enables both excellent exposure of the synovial cyst and facet-joint sparing. Prospective trials with longer follow-up and larger cohorts are needed to validate our recommendations.

Comparative study of microendoscope-assisted and conventional minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To analyze the medium and long-term effectiveness of microendoscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases in comparison with conventional tubular retractor-assisted MIS-TLIF. Methods: Between November 2008 and March 2013, 53 patients with single segment lumbar degenerative diseases were enrolled. According to the different working channel performed, 28 patients were treated by microendoscope-assisted MIS-TLIF (observation group), while the remaining cases received conventional tubular retractor-assisted MIS-TLIF via Wiltse approach (control group). Preoperative baseline data, including age, gender, body mass index, disease etiology, operated level, the ration for requiring bilateral canal decompression, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) socre of low back pain and leg pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, showed no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, postoperative analgesic drug dose, postoperation in-bed time, and perioperative complication incidence were recorded respectively and compared between the two groups. Radiographic evaluation of interbody fusion was performed based on Bridwell grading system at 2 years after operation. VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain, JOA score, and ODI score were assessed before operation, at 2 years after operation, and at last follow-up respectively. Surgical outcome satisfaction was assessed by modified MacNab criteria at last follow-up. Results: When compared with those in control group, both intraoperative blood loss and postoperative analgesic drug dose were significantly decreased in observation group ( P0.05). At last follow-up, the results of patients' satisfaction with surgery evaluated by modified MacNab criteria, and the excellent and good rates of the observation group and the control group were 96.4% and 92.0%, respectively, showing no significant difference ( χ2=0.485, P=0.486). Conclusion: The medium and long-term effectiveness of microendoscope-assisted MIS-TLIF are similar to those of conventional tubular retractor-assisted MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases. The former operation has the additional advantages in terms of more clear surgical site visually, less intraoperative blood loss, and reduced postoperative analgesic dose, all of which seem more feasible to clinical teaching.

Therapeutic Feasibility of Full Endoscopic Decompression in One- to Three-Level Lumbar Canal Stenosis via a Single Skin Port Using a New Endoscopic System, Percutaneous Stenoscopic Lumbar Decompression

STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study involved 450 consecutive cases of degenerative lumbar stenosis treated with percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression (PSLD). PURPOSE: We determined the feasibility of PSLD for lumbar stenosis at single and multiple levels (minimum 1-year follow-up) by image analysis to observe postoperative widening of the vertebral canal in the area. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The decision not to perform an endoscopic decompression might be due to the surgeon being uncomfortable with conventional microscopic decompression or unfamiliar with endoscopic techniques or the unavailability of relevant surgical tools to completely decompress the spinal stenosis. METHODS: The decompressed canal was compared between preoperative controls and postoperative treated cases. Data on operative results, including length of stay, operative time, and surgical complications, were analyzed. Patients were assessed clinically on the basis of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for the back and legs and using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed that PSLD increased the canal cross-sectional area by 52.0% compared with the preoperative area at the index segment (p<0.001) and demonstrated minimal damage to the normal soft tissues including muscles and the extent of removed normal bony tissues. Mean improvements in VAS score and ODI were 4.0 (p<0.001) and 40% (p<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PSLD could be an alternative to microscopic or microendoscopic decompression with various advantages in the surgical management of lumbar stenosis.

Atrofia paraespinal postoperatoria. ¿El abordaje importa? / Postoperative paraspinal atrophy. Does boarding matter?

Objetivo: Comparar la magnitud de la atrofia muscular postoperatoria que producen tres abordajes en fusiones lumbares segmentarias para patología degenerativa (línea media vs. Wiltse vs. MIS TLIF). Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, transversal, multicéntrico, descriptivo y retrospectivo, de una serie de pacientes operados por patología degenerativa lumbar. Analizamos 45 pacientes (24 mujeres), con una edad media de 58.7 años, operados en 5 centros quirúrgicos entre 2015 y 2018. Se realizó una fusión instrumentada de un nivel, desde L3 hasta S1 (7 casos L3-L4, 25 casos L4-L5 y 13 casos L5-S1). Quince casos fueron realizados por abordajes por línea media, 15 por abordaje de Wiltse y 15 MIS TLIF. Todos fueron estudiados con Resonancia Magnética preoperatoria y con un mínimo de 6 meses luego de la cirugía (media de 14.6 meses). Estas fueron analizadas por 3 observadores especialistas en cirugía de columna. Se tomaron 2 variables para comparar el grado de atrofia entre pre y postoperatorio: área de sección transversal (AST) de músculo multifidus (MM) y erectores espinales (EE) y grado de infiltración grasa (IG) mediante la clasificación visual de Kjaer. Los análisis realizados fueron ejecutados utilizando el programa estadístico RStudio (versión 1.1.383) y se compararon valores de p obtenidos mediante la suma de rangos de Wilcoxon. Resultados: No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los distintos abordajes en relación a la atrofia del MM. La comparación de p para AST de los EE mostró diferencias entre MIS TLIF vs línea media (p 0.018) y de línea media vs Wiltse (p 0.027). Conclusión: Los abordajes mínimamente invasivos utilizados para descompresión y artrodesis monosegmentaria lumbar, tuvieron más impacto sobre la atrofia muscular en los EE que en MM. Estudios randomizados y controlados serían de utilidad para validar los resultados de este trabajo.

Aim: To compare the level of post-operative muscle atrophy associated with three different approaches to achieve segmental lumbar fusion in patients with degenerative back disease: (1) the standard midline approach; (2) Wiltse's minimally-invasive surgery (MIS-W) approach; and (3) minimal-invasive surgery (MIS) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Methods and Materials: A multi-center, observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was performed on a series of patients who had undergone surgery for degenerative lumbar disease. All patients were studied preoperatively and for at least six months post-operatively (mean follow-up: 14.6 months) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), all images analyzed by three spine-imaging specialists. Three variables were used to compare the level of atrophy before and after surgery: (1) the cross sectional area (CSA) of the multifidus muscle (MM); (2) the CSA of the spinal erector muscles (SEM); and (3) fat infiltration level, as rated per the Kjaer visual classification system. Inter-group differences in these three outcomes were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: Forty-five patients (24 females), of mean age 58.7 years, underwent surgery at five participating surgical centers between 2015 and 2018. One-level instrumented fusion, from L3 to S1, was performed: at the L3-L4 level in seven patients, L4-L5 in 25, and L5-S1 in 13. Surgical access was split evenly between the three approaches, each performed in 15 patients. No significant differences were detected between the approaches, in terms of MM atrophy or fat infiltration level. Less CSA-SEM atrophy was detected with the MIS-TLIF than midline (p = 0.018), and with the MIS-W than midline (p = 0.027) approach. Conclusions: Relative to the standard midline approach, two minimally-invasive surgery approaches used for decompression and lumbar mono-segmental arthrodesis reduced atrophy in the spinal erector muscles, but not the multifidus muscle. Randomized controlled trials might be useful to validate the results of this investigation.

Discectomía Endoscópica Lumbar Percutánea (DELP): presentación de 60 casos intervenidos en Argentina con pacientes despiertos / Percutaneous Lumbar Endoscopic Discectomy (PRS): presentation of 60 cases operated in Argentina with awake patients

Introducción: La DELP es una técnica mínimamente invasiva que se usa en distintos países desde finales de los años ochenta para el tratamiento de las hernias discales. Nuestro objetivo es describir los resultados de las DELP en una serie de pacientes despiertos, con anestesia peridural y sedación. Materiales y Métodos: En un grupo de 60 pacientes y 77 hernias de discos operados entre abril de 2016 y marzo de 2018, se recogieron datos como la edad, el sexo, la imagen clínica y las anomalías de imágenes mediante MRI. El resultado principal fue la diferencia en los puntajes de Oswestry (ODI) pre y postquirúrgico a las 8 semanas del procedimiento. También se evaluaron los criterios de Macnab, la duración de la operación, el tiempo de hospitalización, las complicaciones quirúrgicas y la necesidad de reintervención. Los pacientes recibieron anestesia peridural y sedación. Resultados: Se operaron 60 pacientes y 77 hernias discales. El promedio de reducción en ODI a las 8 semanas fue 48 puntos (SD=5), representando un porcentaje medio de reducción de 85%(SD=8). Según los criterios de Macnab, tuvieron excelente o buena evolución el 85% de los pacientes, regular 10% y mala evolución 5%. El tiempo de cirugía promedio fue de 50 minutos y el de hospitalización 8,6 horas. Conclusiones: En nuestra serie de pacientes quirúrgicos con hernias discales lumbares la DELP resultó ser una técnica con muy buenos resultados en la reducción del dolor, de corta duración quirúrgica, sin complicaciones y breve estadía hospitalaria. La opción del paciente despierto y la modalidad ambulatoria fueron muy aceptadas por los pacientes y resultaron de factible ejecución.

Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a minimally-invasive technique that has been used in different countries since the late eighties for the treatment of herniated discs. Objective: To describe the results of PELD in a series of awake patients, treated with epidural anesthesia and mild sedation. Methods and Materials: In a group of 60 patients, who together had 77 discs operated upon between April 2016 and March 2018, data were collected on patient age and gender, clinical presentation, and MRI abnormalities. The main outcome of interest was the difference between preoperative and postoperative Oswestry (ODI) scores eight weeks after the procedure. Macnab criteria, operation duration, length of hospitalization, surgical complications, and the need for reoperation were other outcomes evaluated. All patients received epidural anesthesia and mild sedation. Results: The average reduction in ODI at 8 weeks was 48 points (SD = 5), representing an average percentage reduction of 85% (SD = 8). By Macnab's criteria, 85% of patients experienced either an excellent or good result, while 10% and 5% had a fair and poor result, respectively. Average surgery time was 50 minutes and in-hospitalization stay 8.6 hours. Conclusions: In our series of surgical patients with lumbar disc herniations, PELD yielded very good results, manifest as significantly reduced pain, brief procedural durations, no complications, and short hospital stays. Patients accepted the option of being awake and immediately ambulatory, and the approach proved highly feasible to execute.

Técnica de libre flotación foraminal para discectomía endoscópica percutánea lumbar (PELD): nota técnica / Foraminal Free Float Technique for Percutaneous Lumbar Endoscopic Discectomy (PELD): Technical Note

La Discectomía Percutánea Endoscópica Lumbar es una técnica mínimamente invasiva para el tratamiento de las hernias discales lumbares con resultados comparables a la microdiscectomía lumbar. La principal complicación, los fragmentos discales remanentes, son en gran parte producidos por la limitación de movimiento del endoscopio una vez realizada la punción. Presentamos una nota técnica y aplicación en un caso ejemplo de lo que hemos llamado "libre flotación foraminal": un acceso al espacio epidural por vía transforaminal que mantiene la libertad de movimiento y permite una exploración endoscópica en busca de fragmentos remanentes.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a minimally-invasive surgical approach for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, with outcomes similar to open micro-discectomy. The main complication ­ residual disc fragments ­ is largely caused by a rigid endoscopic trajectory once the puncture has been made. We present a technical note of a surgery performed in a patient who underwent what we have called a "free foraminal flotation technique": accessing the epidural space through a transforaminal approach that maintains freedom of movement and allows for endoscopic exploration to locate residual disc fragments.

Abordaje paraespinal de Wiltse: nota técnica y revisión de sus ventajas y limitaciones / Wiltse paraspinal approach: technical note and review of its advantages and limitations

Objetivo: Describir paso a paso el abordaje paraespinal de Wiltse y resaltar las principales ventajas y limitaciones relatadas en la literatura. Material y métodos: Se realizó una descripción del abordaje de Wiltse paso a paso y detalladamente paso a paso, haciendo hincapié en algunos trucos y limitaciones adquiridos con la práctica. Se revisó la literatura disponible con una búsqueda en PubMed y Lilacs bajo los términos Mesh: "Wiltse approach", "paraspinal approach", "muscle sparing approach", "lumbar spine", para destacar ventajas y desventajas de la técnica. Se analizaron 10 trabajos que tenían relación con el objetivo de esta publicación. Ninguno de los trabajos hallados en la búsqueda describía en detalle los pasos del abordaje paraespinal. Se describió: preparación, posicionamiento, incisión, apertura fascial, disección, identificación ósea, desperiostización, descompresión, discectomía, instrumentación, artrodesis y cierre. Resultados: La mayoría de los trabajos resaltaron la utilidad del abordaje como técnica de mínima invasión, con sangrado intraoperatorio mínimo, cortas estadías hospitalarias y bajo índice de infecciones. Conclusión: El abordaje clásico descripto por Wiltse sigue los principios de cirugía de mínima invasión, respetando los planos musculares y tejidos blandos paraespinales, permitiendo amplias descompresiones, discectomías y fusiones con bajos índices de complicaciones.

Objective: To provide a step-by-step description of the Wiltse paraspinal approach, and analyze the main advantages and limitations described in the literature. Methods: We provide a detailed step-by-step description of the Wiltse approach, focusing on some of the strategies we have learned and limitations we have seen in daily clinical practice. A literature review was conducted, consisting of Pub Med and Lilacs searches using the Mesh terms: "Wiltse approach", "paraspinal approach", "muscle sparing approach", and "lumbar spine". Ten papers related to our objectives were assessed, step by step considering patient preparation and positioning, skin incisions, fascial opening, dissection, bone identification, retraction, deperiostization, decompression, discectomy, instrumentation, arthrodesis, and closure. Results: Most papers underline the usefulness of the Wiltse paraspinal approach as a minimally-invasive procedure, emphasizing the minimal intra-operative bleeding, short hospital stays, and low infection rates. However, none of the identified papers thoroughly described specific steps taken using this approach. Conclusion: The classical approach described by Wiltse observes the principles of minimally-invasive surgical procedures, sparing both the muscle planes and soft tissues, thereby allowing for ample decompression, discectomies, and spinal fusions with low complication rates.

Trans-Sacral Epiduroscopic Laser Decompression (SELD) for Low back pain secondary to herniated lumbar disc in the Philippines: A case report and review of literature

@#LBP has a lifetime prevalence ranging from 54% to 80%, an annual prevalence of 15-45%, and a point prevalence of 30%. Lumbar radicular pain often results from a Lumbar disc herniation. With recent advances in technique and access in instrumentation, minimally invasive spine surgery has ushered in a renaissance of spine care. SELD has promising positive effects in controlling LBP following HLD. This is a case of a 26 year old with radicular LBP of 2 years duration secondary to HLD, underwent conservative management of LBP but offered no relief and improvement, hence he became the case for the pioneering procedure of SELD in the Philippines. Immediate and significant improvement in the patient was noted. SELD was proven to be an effective therapeutic modality for patients with LBP secondary to HLD.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression by 30° Arthroscopy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND: Open microscopic laminectomy has been the standard surgical method for degenerative spinal stenosis without instability till now. However, it is associated with complications such as paraspinal muscle injury, excessive bleeding, and wound infection. Several surgical techniques, including microendoscopic decompression, have been introduced to solve these problems. METHODS: Authors analyzed retrospectively 55 patients presenting with neurological symptoms due to degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis refractory to conservative treatment. Patients with foraminal stenosis requiring foraminal decompression were excluded. Two or three portals were used for each level. One portal was used for viewing purpose and the others for instrument passage. Unilateral laminotomy was followed by bilateral decompression under the view of 30° arthroscopy. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using modified Macnab criteria, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analogue scale (VAS). Postoperative complications were checked during the 2-year follow-up. Plain radiographs before and after surgery were compared to analyze the change of disc height decrement and alignment. RESULTS: ODI scores improved from 67.4 ± 11.5 preoperatively to 19.3 ± 12.1 at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.01). VAS scores of the leg decreased from 7.7 ± 1.5 to 1.7 ± 1.5 at the final follow-up (p < 0.01). Per the modified Macnab criteria, 81% of the patients improved to good/excellent. No cases of infection occurred. The intervertebral angle was significantly reduced from 6.26°± 3.54° to 5.58°± 3.23° at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.027) and the dynamic intervertebral angle changed from 6.54°± 3.71° to 6.76°± 3.59°, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.562). No significant change in slippage was observed (3.76% ± 5.01% preoperatively vs. 3.81% ± 5.28% at the final follow-up [p = 0.531]). The dynamic percentage slip did not change significantly, from 2.65% ± 3.37% to 2.76% ± 3.71% (p = 0.985). However, intervertebral distance decreased significantly from 10.43 ± 2.23 mm to 10.0 ± 2.24 mm (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Full endoscopic decompression using a 30° arthroscopy demonstrated a satisfactory clinical outcome at the 2-year follow-up. This technique reduces wound infection rate and did not bring about postoperative segmental spinal instability. It could be a feasible alternative to conventional open microscopic decompression or fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Epidemiological Features of Patients with Subdural Hygroma in a Prospective Case Series

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous screw fixation (PSF) and the open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) on thoracolumbar (TL) fracture. Methods Sixty-four adult patients with TL vertebral fractures who underwent open or percutaneous posterior short-segment transpedicular screw fixation between January of 2013 and September of 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent clinical, radiological and quality of life follow-up for at least 18 months. Results There was no significant difference in age, gender, time between injury and surgery, and preoperative percentage of anterior column height, preoperative sagittal regional Cobb angle, or kyphotic angle of fractured vertebra between these two groups (p > 0.05). There was significantly less intraoperative blood loss in the PSF (87.6 24.6 mL) than in the OPSF group (271.4 142.6 mL) (p < 0.05). The mean surgery time was 62 minutes (range 42­130 minutes) for open and 58 minutes (range 35 to 128 minutes) for percutaneous screw fixation. The surgery time was shorter in the PSF group, but with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores after 18-months were 23.12 8.2 for the PSF and 24.12 9.2 for the OPSF group, without any statistical significance (p > 0.05). Conclusion Both open and percutaneous screw fixations are safe and effective. The percutaneous techniques significantly reduced the intraoperative blood loss compared with the open techniques.

Objetivo Comparar a eficácia e segurança das técnicas de fixação convencional e percutânea para fraturas toracolombares. Métodos Sessenta e quatro pacientes adultos com fraturas da transição toracolombar que foram submetidos a fixação pedicular curta por técnicas aberta convencional e percutânea entre janeiro de 2013 e setembro de 2015 foram retrospectivamente avaliados. Todos foram submetidos a avaliação clínica, radiológica e de qualidade de vida com no mínimo 18 meses do seguimento. Resultados Não houve diferença significativa na idade, sexo, tempo entre o trauma e o tratamento, porcentagem da redução da altura do corpo vertebral pré-operatório, angulo de Cob sagital na região da fratura, ou ângulo de de cifose da vértebra fraturada entre os dois grupos (p > 0,05). Houve uma menor perda sanguínea no grupo percutâneo (87,6 24,6 mL) em comparação com a técnica convencional (271,4 142,6 mL) (p < 0,05). O tempo médio da cirurgia foi 62 minutos (42 - 130 minutos) para a técnica convencional e 58 minutos (35 - 128 minutos) para a percutânea. Apesar de mais curto na técnica percutânea, não houve diferença estatisticamente significante no tempo cirúrgico entre os dois grupos (p > 0,05). Em relação ao índice de incapacidade de Oswestry após 18 meses do tratamento cirúrgico, também não houve diferença significante do ponto de vista estatístico entre os dois grupos, sendo 23,12 8,2 para a técnica percutânea e 24,12 9,2 para o grupo da técnica convencional (p > 0,05). Conclusão Ambas as técnicas mostraram-se eficazes e seguras para o tratamento de fraturas da transição toracolombar. A técnica percutânea apresentou uma taxa de perda sanguínea significativamente menor em comparação à técnica aberta convencional.

Open vs. Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion for Thoracolumbar Traumatic A3 and A4 AO Fractures - 18-Months Follow-Up

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous screw fixation (PSF) and the open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) on thoracolumbar (TL) fracture. Methods Sixty-four adult patients with TL vertebral fractures who underwent open or percutaneous posterior short-segment transpedicular screw fixation between January of 2013 and September of 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent clinical, radiological and quality of life follow-up for at least 18 months. Results There was no significant difference in age, gender, time between injury and surgery, and preoperative percentage of anterior column height, preoperative sagittal regional Cobb angle, or kyphotic angle of fractured vertebra between these two groups (p > 0.05). There was significantly less intraoperative blood loss in the PSF (87.6 24.6 mL) than in the OPSF group (271.4 142.6 mL) (p < 0.05). The mean surgery time was 62 minutes (range 42­130 minutes) for open and 58 minutes (range 35 to 128 minutes) for percutaneous screw fixation. The surgery time was shorter in the PSF group, but with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores after 18-months were 23.12 8.2 for the PSF and 24.12 9.2 for the OPSF group, without any statistical significance (p > 0.05). Conclusion Both open and percutaneous screw fixations are safe and effective. The percutaneous techniques significantly reduced the intraoperative blood loss compared with the open techniques.

Objetivo Comparar a eficácia e segurança das técnicas de fixação convencional e percutânea para fraturas toracolombares. Métodos Sessenta e quatro pacientes adultos com fraturas da transição toracolombar que foram submetidos a fixação pedicular curta por técnicas aberta convencional e percutânea entre janeiro de 2013 e setembro de 2015 foram retrospectivamente avaliados. Todos foram submetidos a avaliação clínica, radiológica e de qualidade de vida com no mínimo 18 meses do seguimento. Resultados Não houve diferença significativa na idade, sexo, tempo entre o trauma e o tratamento, porcentagem da redução da altura do corpo vertebral pré-operatório, angulo de Cob sagital na região da fratura, ou ângulo de de cifose da vértebra fraturada entre os dois grupos (p > 0,05). Houve uma menor perda sanguínea no grupo percutâneo (87,6 24,6 mL) em comparação com a técnica convencional (271,4 142,6 mL) (p < 0,05). O tempo médio da cirurgia foi 62 minutos (42 - 130 minutos) para a técnica convencional e 58 minutos (35 - 128 minutos) para a percutânea. Apesar de mais curto na técnica percutânea, não houve diferença estatisticamente significante no tempo cirúrgico entre os dois grupos (p > 0,05). Em relação ao índice de incapacidade de Oswestry após 18 meses do tratamento cirúrgico, também não houve diferença significante do ponto de vista estatístico entre os dois grupos, sendo 23,12 8,2 para a técnica percutânea e 24,12 9,2 para o grupo da técnica convencional (p > 0,05). Conclusão Ambas as técnicas mostraram-se eficazes e seguras para o tratamento de fraturas da transição toracolombar. A técnica percutânea apresentou uma taxa de perda sanguínea significativamente menor em comparação à técnica aberta convencional.

Novel guidance system assistance percutaneous pedicle screw placement for thoracolumbar vertebral fracture without nerve injury / 局解手术学杂志

Objective The aim of this study was to compare recent clinical efficacy between a novel guidance method for percutaneous pedicle screw placement and the conventional fluoroscopic method for long segments thoracolumbar vertebral fracture without nerve injury. Methods A total of 38 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fracture in our hospital from September 2010 to December 2012 were divided into group A and group B.Eighteen patients in group A underwent 200 percutaneous pedicle screw fixation by conventional fluoroscopic meth-od.Twenty patients in group B underwent 210 percutaneous pedicle screw fixation by a novel guidance method.All the operation for 38 cases were performed by the same surgeon.The time of insertion,radiation exposure,and accuracy of the screw placement between the two groups were compared.The accuracy of screws was evaluated and graded by two consecutive postoperative CT of operation segment for two groups. Results The mean time for a single pedicle screw placement was (13.11 ±2.32)minutes in group A and (10.35 ±1.92)minutes in group B,respectively.The average radiation exposure was (8.11 ±1.15)s in group B and (13.07 ±2.06)s in group A respectively.The differ-ences were statistically significant for both screw placement and radiation exposure times (P 0.05).Conclusion The novel guidance system can significantly reduce the insertion time and radiation expo-sure for long segments percutaneous pedicle screw placement,which provides the same accuracy for screw placement compared with the con-ventional method.

The Principles of minimally invasive spinal surgery / 天津医药

With the development of medical science, the level of minimally invasive spinal surgery is becoming higher and higher. Comparing to the traditional operation, the postoperative effect is equal to it or slightly better than it, with the higher patient satisfaction. The minimally invasive spine surgery is gradually accepted by the majority of patients. However, compared with the traditional operation, minimally invasive spinal surgery requires that spine surgeon must be familiar with principles and related concepts of minimally invasive surgery of the spine, due to its higher degree of fine operating, long learning curve. Only by following these principles and ideas, can the minimally invasive spine surgery be healthy sustainable and rapid developed.

Old and New Fashion: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Adjacent Segmental Spinal Stenosis after Luque Sublaminar Wiring and Posterolateral Fusion: Case Report

STUDY DESIGN: A case report. OBJECTIVES: To report a rare case of minimally invasive spine surgery after sublaminar wiring fixation with Luque rods. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: In the past, sublaminar wiring fixation with Luque rods was believed to be an effective fixation method; however, the development of transpedicular fixation resulted in the discontinuation of this method. Currently, instead of classical surgery using a broad incision, minimally invasive spine surgery is performed, which has a multitude of advantages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initially, the patient underwent Luque sublaminar wiring and posterolateral fusion. After 25 years, minimally invasive TLIF and percutaneous transpedicular fixation were performed for the adjacent segmental spinal stenosis. RESULTS: A good bone union is developing with an excellent clinical outcome, 14 months after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We report a very rare case of a patient who underwent Luque sublaminar wiring and then, 25 years later, had spine surgery with minimally invasive techniques.

Study on the construction of training base and teaching model of minimally invasive spine surgery / 中华医学教育探索杂志

Based on the analysis of the current status and limited factors of MISS at home and aboard,this paper discussed on the importance of MISS training base construction and explored the construction from the aspects of infrastructure constructing,teaching staff training,teaching materials compiling and teaching practice(teaching forms,contents and evaluation)researching.